LEARN! Manual Example #21

This example illustrates how the “Help the Helmetless” activity was evaluated using a mix of quantitative and qualitative evaluation methods, and included baseline and post-activity measurements.

Related Step

8

Evaluation

Age Group

15 to 25 years old

Evaluate. Execute your evaluation plan by conducting process and outcome evaluations. Ensure the quality and relevance of your activity over time, and write a final report.

“Help the Helmetless” (“Hjælp en hjelmløs”) is an activity which since 2016 has run every year in the autumn (normally in September) at universities and higher education institutions in Denmark to promote the use of cycle helmets.

16 to 25 year old youngsters are the age group with the lowest rate of cycle helmet use in Denmark and are also one of the age groups that uses bicycles the most – especially in cities. Insight studies done in 2015, before the activity’s design was developed, showed different reasons for not wearing helmets, and also showed what could motivate students in higher education. Identified motivators included reducing the bridge between going from decision to purchase, and an “If you do it, I will do it too” mentality.

A concept was made with pop-up shops at selected universities and higher education institutes selling a limited number of helmets at a reduced price (14 to 20 Euro). Every year, the pop-up shops visit two to five selected institutions for two or three days and sell between 250 and 450 helmets at each place.

Source: Danish Road Safety Council

The evaluation of “Help a Helmet-less” was conducted using quantitative and qualitative methods:

  • Quantitative: Survey (mobile survey answered via smartphones) sent to the students one month after the students had purchased the helmets (follow-up survey).
  • Qualitative: Observation of helmet use at the universities and higher education institutions selected for a visit, both before and after the pop-up shop was there. During the observations, the number of students wearing a cycle helmet before the event (one week before) and after the event had run (one week after) were counted.

The observations showed that the initiative had a significant effect. However, this qualitative evaluation method was only conducted a few times, as the same significant effect was found via the quantitative survey, as well as due to the resources and time required for the observations.

Source: Danish Road Safety Council

Related LEARN! Material

Categories: